Uncorroborated Meaning: Definition, Examples, and Translations
๐ค
uncorroborated
[หสn.kษหrษห.bษ.reษช.tษชd ]
Definitions
in journalism
Not supported or confirmed by any evidence; unverified.
Synonyms
unconfirmed, unsubstantiated, unsupported.
Which Synonym Should You Choose?
Word | Description / Examples |
---|---|
uncorroborated |
Used in formal or legal situations to indicate that information or a claim does not have supporting evidence or confirmation.
|
unsubstantiated |
Often used in formal writing or speech to describe claims or allegations that lack sufficient evidence or proof. This word can carry a slightly negative connotation.
|
unconfirmed |
Refers to information or claims that have not yet been verified or proven to be accurate. Suitable for general use in everyday language.
|
unsupported |
Describes information, claims, or ideas that do not have backing evidence or supporting data. Can be used in various contexts, including academic and everyday language.
|
Examples of usage
- The journalist decided not to publish the uncorroborated story until more evidence was found.
- It's important to fact-check before sharing uncorroborated information on social media.
in law
Not supported or confirmed by witness testimony or other evidence.
Synonyms
unconfirmed, unsubstantiated, unsupported.
Which Synonym Should You Choose?
Word | Description / Examples |
---|---|
uncorroborated |
Use 'uncorroborated' when referring to information, testimonies, or claims that lack supporting evidence or confirmation. This often appears in legal or formal contexts.
|
unsubstantiated |
Use 'unsubstantiated' to describe claims, accusations, or facts that lack supporting evidence or validation. This is often found in formal, scientific, or legal contexts, and may carry a slight negative connotation.
|
unsupported |
Use 'unsupported' when addressing claims, theories, or data that lack proof or backing, often in scientific or formal arguments. It has a somewhat negative implication, as it questions the validity of the statement.
|
unconfirmed |
Use 'unconfirmed' when discussing news, rumors, or hypotheses that have not yet been verified or validated. This is common in journalism or casual conversations.
|
Examples of usage
- The judge dismissed the case due to the uncorroborated nature of the witness's statement.
- Without corroboration, the claim remains unproven in the eyes of the law.
Translations
To see the translation, please select a language from the options available.
Interesting Facts
Legal Context
- In legal settings, uncorroborated evidence refers to information that lacks additional support, making it less reliable in court.
- Judges often require corroboration to help ensure that narratives or testimonies are credible before making decisions.
Science and Research
- In scientific research, claims must be corroborated by repeatable experiments and peer reviews to gain acceptance in the scientific community.
- Uncorroborated findings can lead to further investigations or debates, as they may not hold up under scrutiny.
Media Critique
- News articles often highlight when a source is uncorroborated, emphasizing the need for verification to maintain journalistic integrity.
- The rise of misinformation has led to increased attention on uncorroborated claims, prompting audiences to seek reliable sources.
Psychology of Belief
- People are generally more likely to believe corroborated information, as it creates a sense of trust and reliability.
- Cognitive biases can influence how we perceive uncorroborated claims, often leading us to believe something if it aligns with our existing beliefs.
Origin of 'uncorroborated'
Main points about word origin
- The word 'uncorroborated' comes from the Latin 'corroborare', meaning 'to strengthen', with the 'un-' prefix signifying 'not'.
- It first appeared in the English language around the late 19th century, reflecting the increasing importance of evidence in legal contexts.
The word 'uncorroborated' originates from the combination of the prefix 'un-' meaning 'not' and the verb 'corroborate' meaning 'to confirm or support with evidence'. It first appeared in the early 19th century, primarily used in legal and journalistic contexts to describe information or claims lacking supporting evidence.